Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 11/30/2020

United States v. Peter Robert Bobal

Citations

  • 981 F.3d 971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, even if the prosecutor’s statements in closing were improper, the court “cured the problem” by “instruct[ing] the jury that the lawyers’ statements were not evidence”
  • noting that USCA11 Case: 21-13795 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 01/12/2023 Page: 11 of 13 21-13795 Opinion of the Court 11 Packingham was distinguishable and did not address whether such a condition violates the First Amendment
  • “A district court does not commit plain error by imposing a com- puter restriction as a special condition of supervised release, even if the term of supervised release is life.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.