Fifth Circuit· 7/30/2018

United States v. Howard Halverson

Citations

897 F.3d 645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “the driving concern” of the Court in Packingham was that the North Carolina statute applied to people who were no longer serving their sentences
upholding a condition on supervised release that prohibited the appellant’s use of the Internet and computer access unless approved in advance by the probation officer
endorsing a diversity of calculation methods because the Paroline factors \need not be converted into a rigid formula\
upholding a condition on supervised release that prohibited the appellant’s use of the Internet and computer access unless approved in advance by the probation officer
reasoning 19 that such conditions are permissible delegations because they do not allow probation officers to punish defendants or require anything “in the nature of punishment” of them
affirming a lifetime ban on internet access absent advance approval from the probation office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Southwick, Willett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.