United States v. Jennifer Aguillard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The holdings of a prior decision can reach only as far as the facts and circumstances presented to the Court in the case which produced that decision.” (quotation marks omitted)
• ‘We have held that an error cannot meet the plain requirement of the plain error rule unless it is clear under current law.” (quotations omitted)
• “The holdings of a prior the dismissal of a pending criminal proceeding charging such conduct.”
• “The holdings of a prior decision can reach only as far as the facts and circumstances presented to the Court in the case which produced that decision.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “The holdings of a prior decision can reach only as far as the facts and circumstances presented to the Court in the case which produced that decision.”
• “The holdings of a prior decision can reach only as far as the facts and circumstances presented to the Court in the case which produced that decision.” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).