Skip to main content
· 8/19/1977

United States v. Sally A. Papia, Russell J. Enea, Joseph v. Basile, and Maximillion J. Adonnis

Citations

  • 560 F.2d 827
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • timing of limiting instruction is left to “sound discretion of the trial judge”
  • theft convictions “restpng] on facts revealing fraud and deceit” admissible under Rule 609(a)(2)
  • “Generally, the necessity, extent and character of supplemen- tary instructions on the law requested by a jury are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court ….”
  • “Generally, the necessity, extent and character of supplemen- tary instructions on the law requested by a jury are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court ….”
  • “Generally, the necessity, extent and character of supplemen- tary instructions on the law requested by a jury are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court ….”
  • “It is clear that a co-conspirator’s arrest does not in itself terminate a conspiracy as a matter of law, for the conspirators may remain fully capable of carrying out their purpose, notwithstanding the arrest of one of their cohorts....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Dillin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.