· 8/19/1977
United States v. Sally A. Papia, Russell J. Enea, Joseph v. Basile, and Maximillion J. Adonnis
Citations
- 560 F.2d 827
- 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- timing of limiting instruction is left to “sound discretion of the trial judge”
- theft convictions “restpng] on facts revealing fraud and deceit” admissible under Rule 609(a)(2)
- “Generally, the necessity, extent and character of supplemen- tary instructions on the law requested by a jury are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court ….”
- “Generally, the necessity, extent and character of supplemen- tary instructions on the law requested by a jury are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court ….”
- “Generally, the necessity, extent and character of supplemen- tary instructions on the law requested by a jury are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court ….”
- “It is clear that a co-conspirator’s arrest does not in itself terminate a conspiracy as a matter of law, for the conspirators may remain fully capable of carrying out their purpose, notwithstanding the arrest of one of their cohorts....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Wood, Dillin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.