United States v. Ogba

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a change in sentence that would alter the special assessment affected the defendant’s substantial rights
• concluding that Confrontation Clause error was harmless because the other evidence was so strong
• “Concurrent sentences imposed for a conviction on the offense and the lesser offense are a ‘cumulative punishment’ that violates the double jeopardy clause.”
• “[I]t cannot seriously be contended that . . . [Medicare and Medicaid] do not affect commerce.”
• “A defendant’s substantial rights are affected if the error affected the outcome of the trial court proceedings.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).