Skip to main content
· 6/6/2005

United States v. Norbert Plavcak

Citations

  • 411 F.3d 655
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10346
  • 2005 WL 1384082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enumerating common types of exigency, including hot pursuit, and noting they must be assessed based on the totality of the circumstances
  • finding exigent circumstances where confidential informant told agents that suspects were burning documents in anticipation of search
  • noting exigency to justify warrantless entry and seizure when there is a concern that evidence will be imminently destroyed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutton, Cook, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.