Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc. v. EquipmentFacts, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in. awarding nominal Rule 37(c)(2) sanctions and costs where withholding party “did not have reasonable grounds to believe it might prevail”
• recognizing that § 1030(e)(11) sets out two clauses that contain discrete definitions of “loss” and that loss can be satisfied by costs under either clause “or a combination of both”
• observing that “‘[l]oss is defined in the disjunctive” and distinguishing between the two clauses
• affirming district court’s award of 14 sanctions on a post-trial motion for Rule 37 sanctions for improperly denying five requests for admission during discovery
• explaining a plaintiff may recover under the CFAA for demonstrating the first, second, or both types of loss
• awarding prevailing party $1,000 where the court deemed full attorney’s fees were not warranted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).