Kentucky Supreme Court· 1/23/2008

Pate v. Commonwealth

Citations

243 S.W.3d 327
2007 WL 4868162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “the jury was not required to believe” testimony indicating the defendant acted alone when other evidence implied the defendant acted together with his wife
finding complicity instruction proper where some evidence pointed to complicity and noting that the jury was not required to believe co-defendant’s testimony that the appellant acted on his own
‘Whether consent is the result of express or implied coercion is a question of fact . . . and thus, we must defer to the trial court’s finding if it is supported by substantial evidence.” (quotation omitted)
“Whether consent is the result of express or implied coercion is a question of fact . . . and thus, we must defer to the trial court’s finding if it is supported by substantial evidence.” (quotation omitted)
risk of danger to police or others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott, Lambert, McAnulty, Minton, Noble, Schroder, Cunningham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.