United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the risk of an erroneous deprivation was low where animals were assessed pre-seizure by trained animal-welfare officers
• concluding that removal of animals without hearing did not violate owners’ right to procedural due process
• concluding that removal of animals without hearing did not violate owners’ right to procedural due process
• concluding that removal of animals without hearing did not violate owners’ right to procedural due process
• observing that \the absence of a ' \firmly rooted\ history' of immunity does not preclude eligibility for qualified immunity\
• concluding the government’s interest in immediately removing animals from an unsafe environment outweighed a property owner’s right to a hearing prior to the seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).