First Circuit· 7/2/2007
United States v. Nascimento
Citations
- 491 F.3d 25
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15755
- 2007 WL 1881304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming that a protective sweep would not allow looking inside a cabinet \too small to accommodate a person\
- noting that gang shared weapons, information, and ‘‘acted on behalf of one another by attempting to assassinate wit- nesses to each other’s crimes’’
- finding that “dignity and the New England climate” created an exigency that allowed officers to enter another room to obtain clothes for partially clothed defendant
- observing, in discussing the existence of the enterprise, that \members used a shared cache of firearms that were regarded as property of the gang\
- rejecting argument that government is required to show \a heightened effect on commerce to sustain a Hobbs Act conviction when the victim ... [i]s not a business\
- applying a single analysis to the sufficiency of proof for these elements to a RICO and a VICAR offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Selya, Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of the Department of Homeland SecurityFirst Circuit· 2007-11-27· cited 213×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-07-18· cited 123×
- United States v. Rene E.First Circuit· 2009-08-31· cited 119×
- United States v. Jorge CornellFourth Circuit· 2015-03-16· cited 103×
- United States v. AyalaFourth Circuit· 2010-04-08· cited 93×
- United States v. SilvaFirst Circuit· 2009-01-23· cited 84×
- United States v. BrandaoFirst Circuit· 2008-08-21· cited 80×
- United States v. DwinellsFirst Circuit· 2007-11-20· cited 77×
- United States v. Ramirez-RiveraFirst Circuit· 2015-08-26· cited 77×
- United States v. JadloweFirst Circuit· 2010-12-03· cited 71×
- United States v. Alejandro UmanaFourth Circuit· 2014-04-23· cited 62×
- United States v. Cruz-RamosFirst Circuit· 2021-01-27· cited 62×
- Merrimon v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaFirst Circuit· 2014-07-02· cited 55×
- United States v. NeedhamSecond Circuit· 2010-05-14· cited 51×
- United States v. GrahamFirst Circuit· 2009-01-09· cited 51×
- DeCaro v. Hasbro, Inc.First Circuit· 2009-09-02· cited 49×
- IMS Health Inc. v. AyotteFirst Circuit· 2008-11-18· cited 48×
- United States v. PoulinFirst Circuit· 2011-01-07· cited 46×
- United States v. TkhilaishviliFirst Circuit· 2019-06-05· cited 43×
- United States v. GerhardFirst Circuit· 2010-07-30· cited 41×
Cites
76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 2,122×
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-02-01· cited 1,531×
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court· 2000-05-15· cited 1,467×
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-25· cited 1,423×
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 1,400×
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,390×
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 1,312×
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court· 1942-11-09· cited 1,246×
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-01-11· cited 1,218×
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 1,152×
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court· 2005-06-06· cited 1,051×
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 824×
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 661×
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 647×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.