United States v. Morais

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no clear error in imposing a fine based on defendant’s assets, employment, and education
• finding that the court adequately addressed defendant’s ability to pay even though its discussion of the relevant factors was “cryptic”
• upholding Internet ban for possession of child pornography where its quantity and content were “egregious”
• upholding a fine in a guidelines case despite the court's \cryptic\ discussion of the defendant's ability to pay
• remanding in these circumstances “with instructions to amend the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement” of a special condition
• upholding Internet ban for possession of child pornography where its quantity and content were \egregious\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).