Skip to main content
· 2/16/2011

United States v. Wiedower

Citations

  • 634 F.3d 490
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3025
  • 2011 WL 520839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a demonstrated lack of candor supports the imposition of a polygraph requirement
  • affirming a ban on the possession of pornography or sexually explicit material because of the defendant’s “deeply rooted affinity for child pornography”
  • allowing prohibition of both child and adult pornography, even though the defendant's offenses only related to child pornography
  • reviewing for plain error and allowing ban on any \form of media containing pornographic images\
  • reviewing for plain error and allowing ban on any “form of media containing pornographic images”
  • upholding a prohibition on the possession of adult pornography where defendant displayed only an affinity for child pornography because the condition helped reduce the “chance he will relapse into this dark world”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Melloy, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.