Skip to main content

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 76 M.J. 413
  • 2017 CAAF LEXIS 856
  • 2017 WL 3841376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “asking [Mitchell] to state his passcode involves more than a mere consent to search”
  • discussing the difference between the physical cellphone and the data contained inside
  • hold- ing that although the appellee’s physical iPhone was ad- missible, the digital contents of the phone were inadmissi- ble
  • referring to a point “even the dissent concedes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan-, Stucky, Ohlson, Sparks, Erdmann, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.