United States v. Kimoana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here an officer is presented with ambiguous facts related to authority, he or she has a duty to investigate further before relying on the consent.”
• “[W]here an officer is presented with ambiguous facts related to authority, he or she has a duty to investigate further before relying on the consent.”
• “[W]here an officer is presented with ambiguous facts related to authority, he or she has a duty to investigate.further before relying on the consent.”
• “[W]here an officer is presented with ambiguous facts related to authority, he or she has a duty to investigate further before relying on the consent.”
• although officers entered room with guns drawn and raised voices, subsequent consent to search was voluntary where guns were holstered and “calm” had been restored
• “[W]here an officer is presented with ambiguous facts related to authority, he or she has a duty to investigate further before relying on the consent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).