United States v. Middagh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the exception applied where “counsel started to speak after the district court imposed [the] sentence,” but “[t]he court cut counsel short, stopping him midsentence and telling him that the ‘matter is done’ ”
• “The extent of explanation necessary to satisfy § 3553(c) will depend on the circumstances. The more obvious the reasons for the sentence, the less the need to announce them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).