In Re Oracle Corp. Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a 7 nonmoving party does not make nor provide support for a possible objection, the court 8 will likewise not consider it
• holding that the content of a deposition is not a clearly established fact for purposes of judicial notice
• holding that if a 17 nonmoving party does not make nor provide support for a possible objection, the court 18 will likewise not consider it
• holding that an earnings miss, standing alone, is insufficient to establish loss causation; the market must have learned of and reacted to the company’s fraudulent practices as opposed to the financial impact of those practices
• specifying that the non-movant “must show more than the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence”
• specifying that the non-movant “must show more than the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).