Sixth Circuit· 4/15/2014

United States v. Michael Smith

Citations

749 F.3d 465
94 Fed. R. Serv. 256
2014 WL 1424484
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Because we conclude that there was no variance, we have no need to address the issue of constructive amendment.”
“But both Apprendi and Alleyne took care not to disturb the district court’s discretionary fact-finding in other circumstances . . . . Our ruling today does not mean that any fact that influences judicial discretion must be found by a jury.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Clay, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Michael Smith

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.