United States v. Vowell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding sixty-five year sentence for man who had sexual intercourse with his girlfriend’s eight-year-old daughter while the girlfriend videotaped it
• affirming district court’s 65-year sentence for coercing a minor to éngage in sexually explicit conduct and on child pornography charges because the “heinous nature of his crimes demonstrated the seriousness of the offense”
• considering “serious psychological and emotional damage as a result of the defendant’s conduct”
• affirming the district court’s imposition of a 65-year sentence for coercing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct and on child pornography charges because the “heinous nature of his crimes demonstrated the seriousness of the offense.”
• citations and internal quotation marks -2- No. 24-5246, United States v. Morman omitted
• “various sexual acts” performed on the body of a sleeping and drugged minor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).