Skip to main content
· 6/9/2008

Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.

Citations

  • 553 U.S. 639
  • 128 S. Ct. 2131
  • 170 L. Ed. 2d 1012
  • 2008 U.S. LEXIS 4703
  • 76 U.S.L.W. 4381
  • 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the phrase, “by reason of,” requires at least a showing of “but for” causation (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding that RICO plaintiff alleging mail or wire fraud must aver facts to 11 show that “someone relied on the defendant’s misrepresentations”
  • recognizing that the phrase, “by reason of,” requires at least a showing of “but for” causation (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding that RICO plaintiff alleging mail or wire fraud must aver facts to 11 show that “someone relied on the defendant’s misrepresentations”
  • recognizing that the phrase, “by reason of,” requires at least a showing of “but for” causation (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • recognizing that the phrase “by reason of” requires at least a showing of “but for” causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.