United States v. Frank Randolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is equally possible that the jury, convinced of guilt, properly reached its conclusion on the compound offense, and then through mistake, compromise, or lenity, arrived at an inconsistent conclusion on the lesser offense.” (quoting Powell , 469 U.S. at 65)
• addressing distinction between inconsistent and ambiguous verdicts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).