United States v. William P. Catena, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of Rule 14 motion to sever 141 counts involving separate acts of medicare fraud
• upholding a conviction under § 2(b) and § 287, where the defendant presented false Medicare claims to private insurance companies, who in turn presented the claims to the federal government
• upholding a conviction underS 2(b) and S 287, where the defendant presented false Medicare claims to private insurance companies, who in turn presented the claims to the federal government
• finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of a motion for severance where “[t]he jury . . . was careful to convict only on [certain] counts”
• doctor convicted of causing insurance carrier to submit false Medicare claims to United States
• false claim submitted to private insurance carrier who sought reimbursement from HEW

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).