Raymond Pandelli v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when performing a double jeopardy analysis, a court must eliminate the inapplicable alternative jurisdictional provisions, which implies that the applicable jurisdictional provisions should factor into the analysis
• Blockburger test need not be applied when congressional intent clear
• where offenses merge for purpose of double jeopardy, “cumulative sentences are forbidden”
• “The Blockburger test . . . focuses on the proof necessary to prove the statutory elements of each offense, rather than on the actual evidence to be presented at trial, or the facts alleged in a particular indictment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).