Skip to main content
· 8/12/1999

United States v. Michael J. Prochilo

Citations

  • 187 F.3d 221
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20695
  • 1999 WL 595379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘Where the accused voices objections to appointed counsel, the trial court should inquire into the reasons for the dissatisfaction.” (quotation and ellipsis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.