United States v. Richard A. Diozzi, United States of America v. Diane M. Diozzi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that it is appro- priate to exclude testimony if the same evidence is avail- able from other sources
• “[attorneys could not serve the dual roles of defense counsel and sworn government witnesses in the same trial”
• disqualification is warranted when the court finds either an actual conflict or a serious potential conflict
• district court has some discretion to limit the exercise of the right to counsel of choice when insistence upon it would interfere with the orderly adminis tration of justice
• ALJ is “free to accept or reject” more restrictive limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).