Skip to main content
· 4/23/1987

United States v. Jose E. Panzardi Alvarez, A/K/A \Polo\

Citations

  • 816 F.2d 813
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, although the one case per year rule is unconstitutional, a court may in its discretion deny pro hac vice application because of unethical conduct
  • approving district court use of ethical guidelines to refuse admission while disapproving use of purely numerical limitations
  • \rote application\ of rule denying appearance of chosen out-of-state attorney was an abuse of discretion denying constitutional right to attorney of choice
  • simple numerical limitation of pro hac vice appearances violated defendant’s right to retain counsel of choice where there was no record that allowing such admissions would have inhibited the fair and orderly administration of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Wisdom, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.