Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 8/28/2008

United States v. Mercer

Citations

  • 541 F.3d 1070
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18511
  • 2008 WL 3942284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s posses- sion of a “large number of plastic jeweler’s bags” constituted evi- dence of intent to distribute a controlled substance
  • noting that cash, plastic bags, and the lack of paraphernalia used to consume drugs can also show the intent to distribute
  • noting that plastic bags are common packaging materi- als in drug distribution schemes
  • discuss- ing that a jury could infer intent to distribute from the fact that the methamphetamine in question was individually packaged in plastic bags
  • the presence of money is one factor that evidences an intent to USCA11 Case: 24-12646 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 05/02/2025 Page: 8 of 9 8 Opinion of the Court 24-12646 distribute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Wilson, Martinez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Mercer

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.