United States v. Stephen G. House

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not err when defining a term in a jury charge when the definition “was consistent with the definition . . . provided by the Supreme Court”
• “[W]here a defendant fails to make a contemporaneous objection to the alleged misconduct in the district court, we review such claims for plain error.”
• “Where a party expressly accepts a jury instruction, such action constitutes invited error and serves to waive his right to challenge the accepted instruction on appeal.” (alterations adopted) (citation and internal quotation marks omit- ted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).