Eleventh Circuit· 6/19/2013

United States v. Thomas Pacchioli

Citations

718 F.3d 1294
2013 WL 3024324
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a defendant must show prejudice resulting from the district court’s failure to read back certain testimony
“Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2) applies only to the agents of party opponents.... ” (emphasis in original)
“Moreover, although the government charged this crime in the conjunctive, the government needed to prove only, in the disjunctive, one of the three charged acts.”
“jury could fairly determine” that defendant “expected to win the[] favor” of individuals based on “remarkable coincidence” of defendant’s provision of valuable free goods and services
“District courts have ‘broad discretion in responding to a jury request that certain evidence be reread.’” (quoting United States v. Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605, 619 (5th Cir. 1977))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett, Marcus, Conway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.