United States v. Thomas Pacchioli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant must show prejudice resulting from the district court’s failure to read back certain testimony
• “Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2) applies only to the agents of party opponents.... ” (emphasis in original)
• “Moreover, although the government charged this crime in the conjunctive, the government needed to prove only, in the disjunctive, one of the three charged acts.”
• “jury could fairly determine” that defendant “expected to win the[] favor” of individuals based on “remarkable coincidence” of defendant’s provision of valuable free goods and services
• “District courts have ‘broad discretion in responding to a jury request that certain evidence be reread.’” (quoting United States v. Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605, 619 (5th Cir. 1977))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).