Skip to main content
· 1/30/2009

United States v. Mauskar

Citations

  • 557 F.3d 219
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1891
  • 2009 WL 215170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] general guilty verdict on a multiple- object conspiracy may stand even if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction on one of the charged objects.” (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Mann, 493 F.3d 484, 492 (5th Cir.2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prado, Elrod, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.