United States v. Enitan Isiwele

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proof does not need to be conclusive, and any flaws go to the weight of the evidence rather than admissibility
• affirming enhancement because defendant’s status as DME supplier placed him in relationship of trust with Medicare
• rejecting defendant’s argument “that a mass marketing enhancement should not apply because his mass marketing efforts were not directed at the victims of the crime—here, Medicare/Medicaid.” Id. at 204.
• “We review de novo the district court’s method of determining loss.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).