First Circuit· 10/29/2003

United States v. Marshall

Citations

348 F.3d 281
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22107
2003 WL 22445609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that “[t]he scope of a warrantless, but consensual, search is generally defined by its expressed object ”
finding that the scope of consent is based on what the typical reasonable person would have understood by the exchange between the officer and subject
noting that “a consenting party may limit the scope of his or her consent or withdraw it altogether”
noting that stated intent to get warrant is not inherently 18 Suppression Tr., doc. no. 42 at 44. 33 coercive where probable cause had been established and officers had good faith belief that warrant would issue
finding statement that officers were going to search the apartment regardless of occupant's consent was not inherently coercive because officers had good faith belief that a warrant could be obtained
standard is 11 “objective reasonableness not the consenting party’s subjective belief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Siler, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.