United States v. Meada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defen- dant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of a con- tainer that was labeled \GUN GUARD\ and thus was \readily identifiable as a gun case\
• “[A] retaliation claim 21 may assert an injury no more tangible than a chilling effect on First Amendment rights.”
• where the label on the container read \GUN GUARD\
• where the label on the container read “GUN GUARD”
• where the label on the container read “GUN GUARD”
• “Within the prison context, a viable claim of First Amendment 25 retaliation entails five basic elements: (1) An assertion that a state actor took some adverse action 26 against an inmate (2) because of (3) that prisoner’s protected conduct, and that such action 27 (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).