United States v. Polouizzi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Adam Walsh Amendments, in categorically preventing an individualized determination of risk, “provide [ ] near certainty of erroneous deprivation of defendant’s liberty interest”
• holding that requirement that all individuals under arrest for child pornography charges be required to undergo electronic monitoring as a condition of pre-trial release unconstitutional as applied
• \The right to travel from one place to another free of hindrances is a well established aspect of constitutionally protected private freedom.\
• “In an as-applied challenge, the question is whether the statute would be unconstitutional if applied literally to the facts of the case ... Factual context and defendant’s circumstances are critical.”
• “Bail conditions are unconstitutionally excessive if they impose restraints that are more than necessary to achieve the government’s interest!,] ... preventing risk of flight and danger to society or children.”
• \[T]here is no statistical foundation for a finding of risk.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).