· 3/10/1995
United States v. Mark Reed
Citations
- 49 F.3d 895
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4815
- 1995 WL 109553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that § 3Cl.l’s ‘willful’ term “implies a mens rea requirement”
- “Where the sentencing judge neither clearly resolves the disputed issue nor explicitly relies on factual assertions made in a PSR, we must remand for further findings.”
- ʺWhere the sentencing judge neither clearly resolves the disputed issue nor explicitly relies on factual assertions made in a PSR, we must remand for further ‐6‐ findings.ʺ
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, McLAUGHLIN, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.