Skip to main content
· 3/10/1995

United States v. Mark Reed

Citations

  • 49 F.3d 895
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4815
  • 1995 WL 109553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that § 3Cl.l’s ‘willful’ term “implies a mens rea requirement”
  • “Where the sentencing judge neither clearly resolves the disputed issue nor explicitly relies on factual assertions made in a PSR, we must remand for further findings.”
  • ʺWhere the sentencing judge neither clearly resolves the disputed issue nor explicitly relies on factual assertions made in a PSR, we must remand for further ‐6‐ findings.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, McLAUGHLIN, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.