Skip to main content
· 3/28/2003

United States v. Lawrence Ivan Johns, Also Known as Larry

Citations

  • 324 F.3d 94
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6005
  • 2003 WL 1594236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Williams and holding that the enhancement was justified where “the PSR sets forth reasonably detailed findings in support of its conclusions”
  • PSR set forth reasonably detailed findings, such as describing the defendant’s testimony at a suppression hearing and at trial, as well as noting the testimony that contradicted the defendant’s testimony
  • “PSR’s conclusions were not sufficient to support an obstruction enhancement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leval, Winter, Levad, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.