Skip to main content
· 2/1/2001

United States v. Guy Woodard

Citations

  • 239 F.3d 159
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “but the question that needs an answer is whether [the defendant] left the jurisdiction ... with the specific intent to ‘obstruct! ] ... the administration of justice’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Leval, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.