United States v. John Maturo, Joseph Samuel Pontillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he [Turkish National Police’s] wiretapping of phones in Turkey was prompted not by a desire to circumvent [American] constitutional constraints, but by [a] logistical problem.”
• DEA agents obtained a subpoena for the credit card records of an investigatory target.
• “[T]he fact that the [Turkish National Police] did not initiate the wiretap until [American agents] gave them the numbers demonstrates only that the [Turkish National Police] was unaware that these individuals were using their phones to traffick [sic] narcotics.”
• credit card records admitted as evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).