United States v. Maack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying enhancement because “[a]s there are no other participants, no one besides [defendant] can be attributed with the money,” and defendant was president of the company in which he owned a controlling seventy-five percent interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).