United States v. Lugene Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant was not unfairly prejudiced under Rule 30 by the trial judge’s decision to correct an incorrect instruction; defendant was never entitled to an instruction referring only to embezzlement
• defendant was not unfairly prejudiced when trial court corrected jury instruction, because defendant never was entitled to jury instruction using only the term “embezzle” where indictment charged defendant with aiding and abetting co-conspirator to “embezzle” “abstract” and “purloin” funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).