United States v. Manuel Glenn Abascal, United States of America v. Paul Gordon Frakes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the recording of all monitored calls is not always a violation of the minimization requirement
• holding that the recording of all monitored calls is not always a violation of the minimization requirement
• the government must do more than show that the telephone subscribers they wish to tap are all part of one conspiracy
• Government must do more than show that the telephone subscribers they wish to tap are part of one conspiracy
• once there is a pattern of innocent calls, the government must terminate interception of such calls
• affidavit sufficiently described defendant’s suspicion of surveillance and attempts to avoid dealing directly with drug sources

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).