United States v. Russell A. Breitweiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when considering a challenge to venue, this court must “view[] the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and mak[e] all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jury verdict”
• affirming offense-level enhancement under § 2A3.4 based on “finding that the defendant committed the [violation of § 2244(a)(3)] by means of threat or fear.” (emphasis added)
• finding no error in the admission of the criminal defendant’s history of sexual conduct be- cause “[t]he evidence was relevant to show [his] motive, intent, knowledge, plan and preparation, and lack of mistake”
• “Congress has provided a means for finding venue for crimes that involve the use of transportation. The violations of the statutes here [abusive sexual contact and simple assault of a minor] are ‘continuing offenses’ under 18 U.S.C. § 3237.”
• sexual abuse of a minor and simple assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).