United States v. Albert Thomas (92-4344) and Angelique Dupree (93-3026)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that information and identification gathered from an eyewitness supported reasonable suspicion
• interpreting the Supreme Court’s then- recent decision in United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1993)
• discussing at length the plain error doctrine set forth in United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993)
• adding weight of cocaine used in initial testing back onto figure determined by independent expert’s subsequent reweighing and finding sum, though less than that initially determined by first expert, to still be above relevant sentencing cut-off amount
• adding weight of cocaine used in initial testing back onto figure determined by independent expert's subsequent reweighing and finding sum, though less than that initially determined by first expert, to still be above relevant sentencing cut-off amount
• interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).