United States v. Lorne Semrau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing instructions for plain error when defendant failed to object after “the court made clear that objections would be ‘sought’ and its ruling would be ‘made,’ or after the jury was charged”
• “Merely proposing a jury instruction is insufficient to preserve an objection.”
• discussing interaction of FED. R. EVID. 403 and Daubert
• “[A] party who objects to any portion of the instructions or to a failure to give a requested instruction must inform the court of the specific objection and the grounds for the objection before the jury retires to deliberate.” (quoting Fed. R. Crim. P. 30(d))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).