United States v. Klebig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction in unlawful firearm possession case; district court should have limited under Rule 403 a live courtroom demonstration of defendant’s two dozen legally 22 No. 23-1264 possessed firearms
• “the inference [should] be reasonable ... to prevent a party from presenting to the jury in closing argument a fact that might have been ruled inadmissible at trial (or at least subject to a limiting instruction).”
• finding error with a demonstration because it introduced new evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).