Brandon Stollings v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the district court “should permit the jury to weigh the strength of the expert’s conclusions”
• stating that an expert’s testimony must be “based on a correct application of a reliable methodology” (emphasis added)
• explaining that the district court “should permit the jury to weigh the strength of the expert’s conclusions”
• explaining that although the district court serves as gatekeeper, \[t]he jury must still be allowed to play its essential role as the arbiter of the weight and credibility of expert testimony\
• holding expert’s focus on the social cost of table saws generally and not the defendant’s table saw specifically does not undermine relevance and is better left for cross examination
• holding that a newspaper article was inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).