Seventh Circuit· 10/22/2009
United States v. Conner
Citations
- 583 F.3d 1011
- 80 Fed. R. Serv. 1406
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23431
- 2009 WL 3380330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that evidence of the defendant’s relationship with a known drug dealer and the defendant’s “extensive history of prior drug activities” was admissible under the 404(b
- finding waiver because defense counsel expressly stated that she agreed with challenged instruction
- pri- or bad acts admissible when it involved “same characters and similar activities”
- prior bad acts admissible when it involved “same characters and similar activities”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Evans, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. GreenThird Circuit· 2010-08-09· cited 298×
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- United States v. Nicolas GomezSeventh Circuit· 2014-08-18· cited 185×
- United States v. JacksonSeventh Circuit· 2010-03-12· cited 112×
- United States v. MoralesSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-18· cited 73×
- United States v. Theodore RichardsSeventh Circuit· 2013-06-14· cited 64×
- United States v. GormanSeventh Circuit· 2010-07-28· cited 63×
- United States v. Kenneth SchmittSeventh Circuit· 2014-10-20· cited 49×
- United States v. FosterSeventh Circuit· 2011-07-21· cited 45×
- United States v. AdamsSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-13· cited 43×
- United States v. Nicholas CejaSeventh Circuit· 2014-08-01· cited 40×
- United States v. BakerSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 39×
- United States v. KlebigSeventh Circuit· 2010-04-08· cited 36×
- Betts v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILL.N.D. Illinois· 2011-05-13· cited 34×
- United States v. Rashid BoundsSeventh Circuit· 2016-06-10· cited 31×
- United States v. BooneSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-27· cited 28×
- United States v. Durrell SmithThird Circuit· 2013-08-06· cited 27×
- United States v. Carl CourtrightSeventh Circuit· 2011-01-13· cited 21×
- United States v. Donald BushFourth Circuit· 2019-11-27· cited 21×
- United States v. Keenan FerrellSeventh Circuit· 2015-11-04· cited 19×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 3,379×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,808×
- Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court· 2008-03-25· cited 548×
- United States v. Bowie, JuanD.C. Circuit· 2000-12-01· cited 279×
- United States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae ScurlockSeventh Circuit· 1996-07-30· cited 157×
- United States v. BrodieSeventh Circuit· 2007-10-19· cited 113×
- United States v. Ruben PulidoSeventh Circuit· 1995-11-02· cited 110×
- United States v. Samuel M. ChaimsonSeventh Circuit· 1985-04-24· cited 107×
- United States v. Rodney McLee and Vicki Murph-JacksonSeventh Circuit· 2006-02-02· cited 106×
- United States v. Augustine Ramirez and Salvador RamirezSeventh Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 103×
- United States v. Brannon L. HatchettSeventh Circuit· 2001-03-26· cited 101×
- United States v. Gregorio MacEdo and Victor Hugo Contreras, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 2005-04-14· cited 93×
- United States v. Frank Allen, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2001-10-19· cited 89×
- Daniel Alvarez, Sr. v. William E. BoydSeventh Circuit· 2000-08-29· cited 86×
- United States v. Robert SimpsonSeventh Circuit· 2007-03-13· cited 77×
- United States v. HarrisSeventh Circuit· 2008-08-06· cited 73×
- United States v. Myro L. WilsonSeventh Circuit· 1994-08-02· cited 72×
- United States v. Dennis D. BestSeventh Circuit· 2001-05-10· cited 70×
- United States v. Andrew A. ChavisSeventh Circuit· 2005-11-09· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.