Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 4/16/2010

United States v. Lee

Citations

  • 603 F.3d 904
  • 2010 WL 1508192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding exigent circumstances based on risk of police safety when \a weapon had been found [nearby] when Lalor was arrested on January 24
  • holding that those provisions apply to individuals who “attempt[] to produce child pornography by communicating with only an adult intermediary”
  • holding that knowing receipt requires a belief that the materials received contain child pornography
  • holding that the defendant’s description of “how many photographs he wanted of each girl” and “how he wanted the girls to pose” contributed to the reasonableness of the jury’s finding that he intended to use the minors for the production of child pornography
  • explaining that the terms No. 22-1156 7 “employs” or “uses” in § 2251(a) do not “contemplate[] direct interaction with a minor aimed at oral persuasion”
  • holding that the defendant’s concern that an online person the defendant intends to have sex with is part of a sting operation supports a relevant inference of guilt because “a relationship with . . . an adult[ ] would not have concerned law enforcement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Pryor, Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.