Eleventh Circuit· 9/13/2019

United States v. Dane Gillis

Citations

938 F.3d 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that possession of child por- nography is evidence of intent to have sex with a minor
“[R]egardless of what [the] court says in its opinion, the decision can hold nothing beyond the facts of that case.”
“[D]icta is defined as those portions of an opinion that are not necessary to deciding the case then before us.”
“[D]icta is a statement that neither consti- tutes the holding of a case, nor arises from a part of the opinion that is necessary to the holding of the case.”
“The holding of a case comprises both the result of the case and those portions of the opinion necessary to that result.” (quoting United States v. Caraballo-Martinez, 866 F.3d 1233, 1244 (11th Cir. 2017) (in- ternal quotation marks omitted))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.