United States v. Dane Gillis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that possession of child por- nography is evidence of intent to have sex with a minor
• “[R]egardless of what [the] court says in its opinion, the decision can hold nothing beyond the facts of that case.”
• “[D]icta is defined as those portions of an opinion that are not necessary to deciding the case then before us.”
• “[D]icta is a statement that neither consti- tutes the holding of a case, nor arises from a part of the opinion that is necessary to the holding of the case.”
• “The holding of a case comprises both the result of the case and those portions of the opinion necessary to that result.” (quoting United States v. Caraballo-Martinez, 866 F.3d 1233, 1244 (11th Cir. 2017) (in- ternal quotation marks omitted))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).