· 7/14/2000
United States v. Johnson, Michael
Citations
- 216 F.3d 1162
- 342 U.S. App. D.C. 319
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16157
- 2000 WL 868745
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the Chapman standard on a § 2255 motion “because the government argued only the Chapman standard below”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Tatel, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.