Skip to main content
· 7/14/2000

United States v. Johnson, Michael

Citations

  • 216 F.3d 1162
  • 342 U.S. App. D.C. 319
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16157
  • 2000 WL 868745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the Chapman standard on a § 2255 motion “because the government argued only the Chapman standard below”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Tatel, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.