United States v. Kennedy, Jimmie Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts are entitled to look at the indictment to determine whether the charged crime was by its nature a crime of violence pursuant to Section 924(c)(3)(B)
• reasoning, in a case where mailing was never received, that \timely filing\ of a statement of service \supports an inference of regularity\
• under § 924(c)(3)(B), \the question is whether the crime with which [appellant] was charged constituted a ... crime of violence\ under a \categorical approach\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• under § 924(c)(3)(B), “the question is whether the crime with which [appellant] was charged constituted a . . . crime of violence” under a “categorical approach” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• a conviction under the Hobbs Act requires a district court to examine the indictment to determine whether the conviction qualifies for an enhancement
• service by mail is acceptable method of notifying defendant under &#167 851(a); government need show only that it mailed the information properly, and not that it was actually received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).